Tag: hungary

  • Hungary ‘slave labour’ regulation sparks protest on parliament steps

    A large crowd presses against the line of riot police in front of the parliament building in Budapest Image copyright EPA Image caption There Were some clashes among police and protesters on the steps of parliament

    Protests have damaged out in Hungary after the usa’s parliament passed new labour regulations, which have been labelled “slave labour” through opponents.

    New rules mean corporations can call for up to 400 hours of overtime a yr and prolong fee for it for 3 years.

    Police used tear fuel against crowds at the steps of the parliament construction on Wednesday night as crowds accumulated.

    Opposition politicians had created chaos inside, blocking stairways and blowing whistles to disrupt the votes.

    They have been additionally offended over a 2d vote to create a new device of administrative courts controlled by means of the minister of justice, which critics worry will not be impartial.

    Image copyright Reuters Image caption A small team of protesters set fire to a couple boulevard furniture and refuse

    It followed a weekend protest over the proposed change, the place crowds amassed calling for upper minimal wages, in preference to a rise in extra time.

    In Hungary, the legislation in the past allowed for corporations to demand a most of 250 hours of extra time in a given year.

    But for somebody who works 8-hour days, the new amount of 400 hours is the similar of an hour of additional labour every day, an extra day’s work every week, or 50 further days every year.

    Viktor Orban’s Hungary: The Whole tale Hungary us of a profile Hungary bans rough napping

    Mr Orban’s executive, on the other hand, argues that the labour reform will receive advantages employees besides as firms who need to fill a labour shortage.

    “we’ve to remove bureaucratic rules in order that individuals who want to paintings and earn more can do so,” he stated on Tuesday ahead of the bill handed.

    Neither the u . s .’s business unions nor the political opposition agree.

    Skip Twitter put up by means of @zgurmai_EN

    Lately is a black day for the Industry Unions, for employees for ⁦@mszptweet⁩ for the innovative parties. We porgressive Ladies didn ’t permit to start the seccion on the slave regulation. Sufficient sufficient. ⁦@PES_PSE⁩ ⁦@PES_Women⁩ ⁦@TheProgressives⁩ ⁦@FEPS_Europe⁩ pic.twitter.com/7kdqPBRWJh

    — ZitaGurmai (@zgurmai_EN) December 12, 2018

    Document

    End of Twitter publish via @zgurmai_EN

    The judicial reform may be seen as controversial by a lot of the high minister’s opponents.

    Since coming to power, Mr Orban has remained widespread through adopting a robust anti-migrant stance and championing nationwide sovereignty.

    A document from the eu Union into its member state accuses his executive of attacks on the media, minorities and the guideline of law.

    The Ecu Parliament took the unheard of step of balloting to pursue disciplinary action towards Hungary, citing – among different things – issues over drive being positioned on the courts, common corruption and the independence of the electoral device.

    Critics of the new administrative court fear that it may continue that trend.

    The new courts can be supervised by Mr Orban’s justice minister, who will hire its judges. Its remit – to handle public management problems – will likely cover spaces together with elections and corruption.

    It will run in parallel to the present court machine, but and not using a oversight through it.

    Mr Orban, on the other hand, has been defiant within the face of increasing isolation in Brussels, labelling the EU’s actions against him as “blackmail” and an “insult” to his united states of america.

  • Understanding ‘illiberal democracy’ and the fight for the West

    Western leftists likes to mock Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban when he infamously said that Hungary would pursue an “illiberal democracy” in opposition to Western European social democracy &mdas

    ANALYSIS/OPINION:

    Western leftists likes to mock Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban when he infamously said that Hungary would pursue an “illiberal democracy” in opposition to Western European social democracy — which might more accurately be labeled as intolerant socialism. If one wants to be intellectually rigorous (not a virtue common among liberals), it’s necessary to dig deeper into Mr. Orban’s concept to see what he is actually talking about.

    The big beef that Hungary and other Central European nations have with European liberal democracies is that they are not liberal at all. They are totalitarian, especially if you do not share their views. Just ask Tommy Robinson, the right-wing activist sent to jail essentially for espousing his beliefs in public in the United Kingdom.

    The unelected leaders and bureaucrats within the European Union have taken it upon themselves to inflict their view of the world upon the continent and beyond. It’s a culturally Marxist agenda, one that threatens the very existence of nations as sovereign entities in Europe.

    This agenda includes the destruction of Europe’s Christian past; the welcoming of millions of migrants from North Africa and the Middle East who lack a common cultural heritage with Europe; the demonization of Israel; the suppression of free speech and freedom on the internet if they threaten liberal pieties; and the unconditional erasure of national borders and local control.

    This is not “liberalism” in any classic sense. It is much more accurately defined as elite control and supernationalist totalitarianism.

    The small countries of Central Europe, known as the Visegrad nations, have had enough. Of course they do not want this future for their children. Who would?

    When Mr. Orban and the Poland’s ruling Law and Justice Party talk of “illiberal democracy,” they are attacking the dangerous, undemocratic agenda of the George Soros-backed EU crowd who want to destroy the nations of Europe. Christian Central Europeans don’t want to be overrun and will not be bullied by Brussels. They will not be bought off with EU money.

    Luckily for Europe, this rejectionist viewpoint is starting to spread, as nations like Italy and Austria are also questioning the internationalist dogma and have recently elected right-of-center nationalist governments.

    Leftists try to dismiss any opposition to their agenda and narrative with epithets such as “far-right,” “Nazi” or “extremist.” But ordinary people are starting to see through this charade, and the name-calling doesn’t really work anymore.

    The NGOs that Hungary kicked out of the country were of course engaged in political agitation. These groups were enabling the migrant crisis into Europe for a reason. They did not care about these so-called “refugees.” They cared only for the undermining of European society as it once existed. It is the same agenda we see playing out in the United States, with President Trump’s critics pushing for unlimited immigration, open borders and giving the vote to illegal aliens.

    Those on the left know they cannot win elections on a sustainable basis with such an agenda. So, instead of trying to win over voters, they try to change the make-up of who gets to vote. Presto! Promise the migrants everything in exchange for the vote, while those evil white men will pay for everything.

    As Mr. Orban put it shortly after winning a third term in office this year, “We have replaced a shipwrecked liberal democracy with a 21st-century Christian democracy, which guarantees people’s freedom, security. … It supports the traditional family model of one man and one woman, keeps anti-Semitism at bay, and gives a chance for growth.”

    It is Mr. Orban’s critics who are being dishonest about their “progressive” agenda in Europe and what lies behind their definition of liberal democracy. I don’t support everything that Mr. Orban and some of his nationalist allies have done to restrict press freedom and the like, but as the saying goes, let those without sin cast the first stone. Hungary, Poland, and the Czech Republic are fighting the good fight against the leviathan of European socialism. They are trying to save their peoples from the destructive policies of Brussels.

    That may be liberal or illiberal, but the conversation in the media on the debate and the stakes could use a whole lot more honesty.

    L. Todd Wood is a former special operations helicopter pilot and Wall Street debt trader, and has contributed to Fox Business, The Moscow Times, National Review, The New York Post and many other publications. He can be reached at LToddWood.com.

  • What sanctions can the EU impose on Hungary?

    Opposition protest in Budapest Image copyright Getty Images Image caption Opposition protesters take to the streets after elections in Hungary

    The European Parliament has voted to pursue disciplinary action against Hungary under Article 7 of the European Union treaty.

    The right-wing Hungarian government has been accused of attacks on the media, minorities and the rule of law – charges denied by Prime Minister Viktor Orban.

    Article 7 is designed to protect the European Union’s fundamental values.

    It sets out ways various EU bodies can act if they believe those values are at risk, or have been seriously breached.

    These values are founded on respect for:

    It highlighted concerns about freedom of expression, academic freedom, judicial independence, the electoral system and the treatment of minorities as well as asylum seekers and refugees.

    It described the country as being “at clear risk of a serious breach of EU values” and called for a full parliamentary vote on the matter.

    The only other occasion the EU has formally resorted to Article 7 is over Poland, where there’s been an ongoing dispute with its authorities over judicial reforms – but there has been no parliamentary vote on the issue.

    EU votes for disciplinary action against Hungary In depth – Viktor Orban’s Hungary Nationalism in heart of Europe needles EU

    The EU had voiced concern about the independence of the courts following Polish government moves to change or remove judges.

    It was the executive, the EU Commission, which decided to act in that case, invoking Article 7 in December 2017 after concluding that there was “a clear risk of a serious breach of the rule of law in Poland”.

    The arguments with Poland are continuing.

    Image copyright EPA Image caption There’s been concern about changes to the judiciary in Poland

    Preventative action

    It’s important to make clear that Article 7 is a process rather than an end in itself.

    And the process is divided into separate parts, with one not necessarily dependent on the other.

    Under the preventative mechanism, the commission, the European Council or the Parliament can start the Article 7 process to determine whether there is a “clear risk of a serious breach of EU values”.

    The parliament has to agree by two-thirds of those MEPs who take part in the vote, which must also be an absolute majority of all MEPs, to start the process.

    It then goes to the EU Council – the heads of government of the member states.

    The council must agree by a four-fifths majority that there is a risk of breaching EU values (and then recommend specific actions to be taken by the country concerned).

    European Parliament sources say there is no particular timeframe for this process – and that, in theory, the council could do nothing and simply ignore the vote by the parliament.

    Sanctions

    Under the sanctions mechanism enshrined in Article 7, only the council or the commission can trigger the process.

    The council then has to decide unanimously that “a serious and persistent breach of EU values has taken place”.

    It has to also get the agreement of two-thirds of the parliament to this.

    Once that has been done, the council has the power to suspend some of the country’s membership rights – such as voting rights in the council itself.

    However, it is not clear what other rights can be suspended.

    And the council can only take this ultimate step by a qualified majority amounting to 72% of member states.

    At the moment, this is not the course of action being proposed in the case of Hungary, although in theory that route remains open to the EU at a later stage.

    Read more from Reality Check

    Send us your questions

    Follow us on Twitter

  • EU votes for disciplinary action against Hungary

    Hungary's Prime Minister Viktor Orban places his hand on his head in an emotive gesture Image copyright AFP Image caption Vicktor Orban launched an impassioned defence of his country on Tuesday – but it was not enough

    The European Parliament has voted to pursue unprecedented disciplinary action against Hungary over alleged breaches of the EU’s core values.

    Prime Minister Viktor Orban’s government has been accused of attacks on the media, minorities, and the rule of law – charges which he denies.

    MEPs backed the vote by 448 to 197, giving it the two-thirds required for proceedings to go ahead.

    If also approved by national leaders, Hungary could face disciplinary action.

    Wednesday’s vote is the first time the European Parliament has voted to take such action against a member state under EU rules.

    Measures could include suspension of the country’s voting rights in Europe or other sanctions.

    Mr Orban personally spoke to the parliament on Tuesday in defence of his country, labelling the threat of censure as a form of “blackmail” and an insult to Hungary.

    He claimed a report by Dutch MEP Judith Sargentini was an “abuse of power”, and included “serious factual misrepresentations”.

    In depth – Viktor Orban’s Hungary Nationalism in heart of Europe needles EU

    Since coming to power, Mr Orban’s government has taken a hardline stance against immigration. It introduced a law which made it a criminal offence for lawyers and activists to aid asylum seekers, under the banner of “facilitating illegal immigration”.

    Ms Sargentini’s report into Hungary’s ruling Fidesz party alleged such actions were “a clear breach of the values of our union”.

    Under an EU rule called Article 7, breaching the union’s founding principles can lead to suspending a member state’s rights as a punitive measure.

    Suspension of Hungary’s voting rights is the most serious possible consequence – but is considered unlikely, as Poland’s nationalist government may support Hungary.

    Poland is itself facing disciplinary proceedings, launched by the European Commission in December last year. The case has yet to reach the European Parliament.

    The decision on Hungary will now be referred to the the EU’s 28 member states to consider.

  • Hungary pursued through EUROPEAN over ‘Stop Soros’ migrant legislation

    Afghan child refugees in an abandoned building at the Serbian border. Hungary and Croatia have been stopping refugees crossing the borders into the EU, many refugees are stuck in Serbia, 11 November 2017 Image copyright Getty Photographs Image caption Asylum seekers are often detained at the border with Serbia

    The Ecu Commission says a regulation in Hungary that criminalises support for asylum seekers is illegitimate amid a combat with the country over EU migration.

    Hungary has now been cited the ecu Court Docket of Justice (ECJ) for “non-compliance” with EUROPEAN regulation.

    Viktor Orban’s executive passed a regulation in June declaring someone “facilitating unlawful immigration” may face prison.

    The regulation used to be dubbed “Forestall Soros” after the billionaire philanthropist Hungary accuses of assisting Muslim migrants.

    On Thursday, the Commission chided Hungary over the regulation, which it stated curtailed asylum applicants’ right to turn to nationwide, global and non-governmental firms for assist.

    It stated that an infringement procedure were opened towards the country since the new regulation broke ECU laws, including that a “letter of formal understand” have been issued.

    The Fee has accused Hungary of failing to respect Eu legislation whilst it returns asylum seekers to other countries or detains them on its border with Serbia.

    “The Commission considers that the indefinite detention of asylum seekers in transit zones with out respecting the appropriate procedural promises is in breach of EU laws,” it mentioned in a statement.

    who is George Soros? Orban: ‘Europe has been invaded’ May migration difficulty finish EUROPEAN?

    Closing month, a file through the Council’s Venice Fee leaked to the BBC raised issues over the new Hungarian regulation, noting that the law “criminalises organisational activities that are indirectly related to the materialisation of the illegal migration”.

    The Hungarian executive argues that it’s doing the remainder of Europe a carrier by limiting the glide of what it regards as illegal migrants into the bloc.

    Hungary has additionally stated that immigration threatens its national security, but its hardline stance has been met with common international criticism.

    Hungarian-American businessman George Soros is certainly one of the world’s most famed, and philanthropic, monetary investors.

    At the height of Europe’s refugee hindrance, Mr Soros pledged generous backing for assist groups assisting migrants.

    Why is the law controversial?

    The legislation has amended 8 present laws and introduced the new crime of “facilitating unlawful immigration”.

    Under the new regulation, somebody may well be jailed for working for or with non-governmental organisations which might be considering serving to or campaigning for asylum seekers. Human rights teams insist all they are seeking to do is help individuals who have entered Hungary to legally follow for asylum.

    The measures additionally tighten regulations on asylum, so that somebody trying to enter Hungary from a 3rd u . s . a . where they don’t seem to be straight away threatened with persecution cannot claim protection.

    When some FOUR HUNDRED,000 other folks travelled through Hungary within the heart of the migrant challenge of 2015 on their method to Western Europe, Mr Orban ordered fences be submit to halt the inflow.

    The Commission imposed a compulsory asylum quota for each EU state in response to the trouble, however Mr Orban refused to simply accept Hungary’s.

    In 2015, 177,000 other folks sought asylum in Hungary but just a few hundred had been generic. Ultimate 12 months, the number of asylum claims fell to approximately THREE,200.

  • Hungary jails gang for deaths of 71 migrants in lorry

    Lorry on A4 motorway in Austria (27 Aug 2015) Image copyright Getty Images Image caption The stunning case drew consideration to the suffering of migrants smuggled to Europe

    Four males have received 25-12 months jail terms in Hungary over the deaths of SEVENTY ONE migrants who suffocated in a sealed lorry in August 2015.

    Police found the victims’ decomposing bodies in the lorry, registered in Hungary and deserted near an Austrian village.

    It came amid a migrant surge to Europe.

    An Afghan identified as the gang leader were given 25 years, as did three Bulgarian accomplices. Ten others, all however one Bulgarians, got shorter jail terms.

    They have been all found in charge of individuals-smuggling.

    Image copyright AFP Image caption The alleged ringleader is an Afghan denied refugee standing

    What had been the charges?

    in keeping with the prosecution, the smugglers knew that the migrants squeezed into the back have been going to die, and they unnoticed the sound of them banging on the sealed inner, because the oxygen ran out.

    The alleged ringleader is Samsoor Lahoo, a 31-12 months-antique Afghan. The evidence produced in opposition to him included a telephone-tap recording during which he allegedly ordered the driving force to keep going in spite of the victims’ cries for assist.

    9 Bulgarians, Mr Lahoo and a Lebanese nationwide had been in court.

    Prosecutors say the crowd was once charging migrants as much as €3,500 (£3,100; $FOUR,ONE HUNDRED) in step with head and had planned two extra smuggling journeys for 27 August – the day after the our bodies have been found.

    What was once the response?

    The tragedy fuelled an outpouring of sympathy for refugees and migrants, and was a catalyst within the decision in August 2015 to open borders and allow them to go on towards Germany. In 2015-2016 approximately 1,000,000 had been allowed to stick in Germany – a extremely controversial determination.

    But as the challenge endured into 2016 Austria’s then international minister and now Chancellor, Sebastian Kurz, performed a key position in shutting down the Balkan direction utilized by migrants.

    Boundaries went up, together with a formidable razor-twine fence on Hungary’s southern border, completed in April 2017.