{"id":17137,"date":"2018-09-12T00:15:07","date_gmt":"2018-09-12T00:15:07","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/allworldsnews.com\/worlds\/controversial-eu-copyright-change-faces-key-vote\/07"},"modified":"2018-09-12T00:15:07","modified_gmt":"2018-09-12T00:15:07","slug":"controversial-eu-copyright-change-faces-key-vote","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/pornvas.com\/?p=17137","title":{"rendered":"Controversial EU copyright change faces key vote"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"b-article-ext\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" alt=\"A composite image shows the EU flag, with a copyright symbol embedded in the centre of its iconic ring of yellow stars\" src=\"http:\/\/allworldsnews.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/controversial-eu-copyright-change-faces-key-vote-5b985a8b899e6.jpg\" width=\"976\" height=\"549\"\/> Image copyright Getty Images Image caption The proposed reform has attracted enormous attention and fierce campaigning on both sides <\/p>\n<p>EU lawmakers are set to vote on a controversial copyright reform that could change how internet companies treat uploaded content from users.<\/p>\n<p>A version of the proposal was rejected in July after a grassroots campaign, and fierce campaigning on both sides.<\/p>\n<p>Critics fear the rules are too broad and could affect parodies, remixes, and even links to articles and websites. <\/p>\n<p>But many musicians, authors, and other creators back the reforms which they view as necessary to support artists.<\/p>\n<p>Hundreds of changes have been made since the July vote, but opponents say major issues remain.<\/p>\n<div id=\"bbccom_mpu_1_2_3\" aria-hidden=\"true\">  <\/div>\n<h2>What is the controversy?<\/h2>\n<p>The proposed copyright directive is supposed to protect creators by forcing payments to be made to them if their work is copied or linked to online.<\/p>\n<p>Most of it is not controversial, and the debate is centred around two sections: articles 11 and 13.<\/p>\n<p> Why Europe&#8217;s copyright plan was so controversial Copyright law could put end to net memes <\/p>\n<p>Article 13 has attracted the most attention, and been labelled an &#8220;upload filter&#8221; by critics. <\/p>\n<p>If a user tries to upload copyrighted music, photos, or anything else, it must be checked against a database &#8211; and filtered out if it contains copyrighted material.<\/p>\n<p>Effectively, it makes sites like Facebook and Youtube responsible for what its users upload.<\/p>\n<div>\n<div>\n<div>\n<div role=\"region\" aria-label=\"Twitter post by @EDiMA_EU\"> Skip Twitter post by @EDiMA_EU <\/p>\n<div>\n<p lang=\"en\" dir=\"ltr\">Did you know that memes containing copyrighted images will be blocked by automated filters under the copyright directive? #FixCopyrighthttps:\/\/t.co\/p92ip1RPBd pic.twitter.com\/BH6KzHrW9L<\/p>\n<p>\u2014 EDiMA (@EDiMA_EU) September 6, 2018 <\/p>\n<div>Report<\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<p id=\"jump-linkhttps:\/\/twitter.com\/EDiMA_EU\/status\/1037621927832109058\" tabindex=\"-1\">End of Twitter post by @EDiMA_EU<\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<p>But with more than 400 hours of video uploaded to YouTube every minute, no human could do the job &#8211; filtering would need to be done automatically by computers.<\/p>\n<p>Such systems are both expensive and often criticised for being over-zealous and filtering anything that might be copyright-protected.<\/p>\n<p>For example, some people believe that background music playing in a family video could be filtered out, or that small samples of copyrighted content in a parody or internet meme image could be enough to trigger the automatic filter.<\/p>\n<p>The possibility has led to such systems being labelled &#8220;censorship machines&#8221; by some opponents. MEPs behind the directive say such claims are wrong, and have decried what they see as a misinformation campaign.<\/p>\n<p>The other debated section, article 11, seeks to grant new rights to news outlets and publishers, giving them a slice of revenue from aggregators like Google who link to their content. <\/p>\n<div>\n<div>\n<div>\n<div role=\"region\" aria-label=\"Twitter post by @Senficon\"> Skip Twitter post by @Senficon <\/p>\n<div>\n<p lang=\"en\" dir=\"ltr\">The amendment by @AxelVossMdEP proves this \u201cmythbuster\u201d wrong: If snippets were not affected, why would his new amendments only allow individual words to accompany a link? If you use more than that, like a headline, you have to pay. https:\/\/t.co\/kZ7vUTur1A #SaveYourInternet<\/p>\n<p>\u2014 Julia Reda (@Senficon) September 10, 2018 <\/p>\n<div>Report<\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<p id=\"jump-linkhttps:\/\/twitter.com\/Senficon\/status\/1039159371844988928\" tabindex=\"-1\">End of Twitter post by @Senficon<\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<p>But the broad nature of the rules led to fears that even simple hyperlinks or short &#8220;snippets&#8221; could be costly &#8211; potentially affecting a core part of how the world wide web functions.<\/p>\n<h2>Who is for and against?<\/h2>\n<p>Many creative industry associations continue to campaign for the directive to be implemented &#8211; including Britain&#8217;s record label group BPI and the Society of Authors.<\/p>\n<p>Supporters say the new rules will protect artists and creators, making it easier for them to earn a living &#8211; and that the amendments made since July should assuage concerns.<\/p>\n<div>\n<div>\n<div>\n<div role=\"region\" aria-label=\"Twitter post by @Soc_of_Authors\"> Skip Twitter post by @Soc_of_Authors <\/p>\n<div>\n<p lang=\"en\" dir=\"ltr\">Nobody\u2019s hearing about all the good things in the Directive \u2013 like the transparency triangle. Authors will get proper accounting of how well their work\u2019s doing, and a proper share of the profits if they do well.<\/p>\n<p>\u2014 Society of Authors (@Soc_of_Authors) September 7, 2018 <\/p>\n<div>Report<\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<p id=\"jump-linkhttps:\/\/twitter.com\/Soc_of_Authors\/status\/1037993725979443200\" tabindex=\"-1\">End of Twitter post by @Soc_of_Authors<\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<p>Record labels have campaigned for the reform to go ahead, along with music titans like Sir Paul McCartney.<\/p>\n<p>Ahead of the July vote, some 1,300 musicians declared support for the changes, which would require websites like YouTube or Facebook to detect and delete user uploads of copyrighted music. <\/p>\n<p>But the divide between those for and against is not entirely clear-cut. <\/p>\n<p>Musician Wyclef Jean of the Fugees, for example, is in Strasbourg campaigning against the changes, which he believes will actually hurt musicians. <\/p>\n<p>And while some critics say the changes will hurt small businesses to the benefit of existing internet giants, those same giants &#8211; including Facebook and Google &#8211; also oppose the directive, which would make them liable for content uploaded by their users.<\/p>\n<h2>What happens next?<\/h2>\n<p>The July vote was defeated 318-278 after thousands of ordinary people contacted their European representatives following a grassroots campaign.<\/p>\n<p>But under European parliament rules, that meant it would be amended and debated before going for another vote, due on Wednesday.<\/p>\n<p>More than 250 changes to the original text have been proposed.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;This vote is our best chance to prevent EU copyright reform from causing lasting harm to the open internet,&#8221; MEP Julia Reder said in a blog post criticising many of the proposed changes.<\/p>\n<p>Digital rights group the Electronic Frontier Foundation, meanwhile, said the proposal was &#8220;so terrible, it can only be called an extinction-level event for the internet as we know it&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p>French MEP Marc Joulaud told the AFP news agency, which also backs the measure: &#8220;The feeling of many in parliament is that on Wednesday we decide the life or death of the law.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;We can still finish on time if the text passes on Wednesday. This is the last slot,&#8221; he said.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Image copyright Getty Images Image caption The proposed reform has attracted enormous attention and fierce campaigning on both sides EU lawmakers are set to vote on a controversial copyright reform that could change how internet companies treat uploaded content from users. A version of the proposal was rejected in July after a grassroots campaign, and [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":17135,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[8],"tags":[602,6597,7862,3636,727],"class_list":["post-17137","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-worlds","tag-europe","tag-european-commission","tag-intellectual-property","tag-internet","tag-uk-news"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/pornvas.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/17137","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/pornvas.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/pornvas.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pornvas.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pornvas.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=17137"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/pornvas.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/17137\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/pornvas.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=17137"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pornvas.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=17137"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pornvas.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=17137"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}